Your Family Physician

Sunday, May 3, 2009

Teratology and Drug Use During Pregnancy

Introduction

Drug use is an uncommon cause of birth defects, yet approximately 200,000 children (3-5% of live births) are born with birth defects each year.1

While some papers estimate that 1-3% of birth defects are thought to be caused by medications taken during pregnancy, the authors could not find a source for this statement that was based on study data.

The purpose of this article is to provide an organized source of information about medication use in pregnancy, with data regarding commonly used medications and pregnancy categories established by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Approach to Patients Needing Medication During Pregnancy

Because any medication can present risks in pregnancy, and because not all risks are known, the safest pregnancy-related pharmacy is as little pharmacy as possible. However, women with a history of psychiatric, seizure-related, or hematologic illnesses frequently require medication throughout pregnancy. In such patients, care must to be taken to select the safest drug from the necessary class of medication. Misri and Kendrick noted that prescribing drugs for women during the antenatal and postnatal period is a balancing act and that no risk-free alternatives exist.2

As an example of this difficulty, Mahadevan reviewed medications commonly used to treat GI disease.3 Most were FDA pregnancy category B and C, and a few were pregnancy category D. (See FDA Rating System for the Teratogenic Effects of Drugs below.) The author suggested that some medications should never be used during pregnancy because of their clear risk of teratogenicity or adverse events. Particular drugs are bismuth, castor oil, sodium bicarbonate, methotrexate, ribavirin, doxycycline (and by extension minocycline and tetracycline), and thalidomide.

Each area of pharmacologic therapy intervention must be assessed separately and specifically for each patient. For example, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common during pregnancy and presents difficulties in choosing optimal medications.4

For most patients, lifestyle modifications are useful, but these are usually insufficient to control symptoms, and medication is often required. First-line medical therapy for pregnant woman with GERD entails antacids. If antacids fail, use of histamine-2 receptor antagonists and proton-pump inhibitors can be attempted; these drugs do not seem to be associated with clinically significant risks in pregnancy. In rare cases, promotility agents can be prescribed, though the risks and benefits must carefully be discussed with the patients before the drugs are started. Similar assessments must be made with drug therapy for inflammatory bowel disease5 and even constipation6 .

A physician caring for a pregnant patient who requires medication should take care in choosing dosages and types of drugs that maximize effectiveness while minimizing fetal risk. It is essential to understand the effect of medications and to know the point in fetal development when drugs are most toxic and when fetal organs are most susceptible. In addition, healthcare providers who treat pregnant women must be familiar with methods of gathering information about drugs, and they must be aware of online databases that are most useful for this purpose.

Several resources are available to expand one’s knowledge of teratology. Teratogen Information System (TERIS) and Reprotox are Internet databases that cover this subject. The Organization of Teratology Information Specialists is a network of risk-assessment counselors in the United States and Canada who specialize in researching and communicating the risks associated with drug exposures in pregnancy. All of these are useful resources to learn about drug use in pregnancy. They are frequently updated and should be referenced frequently, particularly when one is prescribing unfamiliar drugs in pregnancy.

General guidelines for choosing dosages and types of drugs within a class are lacking. Each drug should be assessed, and its risks and benefits should be weighed. Various organizations, including the Organization of Teratology Information Specialists, have performed many studies in this area. Specific drugs should be investigated before they are used.

Risk-benefit assessment and counseling should involve the patient and her current state of health. Counseling should actively involve the patient and the physician. The physician must consider the effects of drug exposure on the developing fetus or embryo and acknowledge specific susceptibilities at each point in fetal development, as balanced against the risks of worsening maternal illness.

In a 2008 Canadian study, 19.4% of women were found to have used FDA category C, D and X medications at least once during pregnancy, the most common of these being albuterol, co-trimoxazole, ibuprofen, naproxen and oral contraceptives.7 Analyzing the same data, Yang noted that woman who had such exposure were more commonly characterized by chronic diseases, younger age, increased parity, and receipt of social assistance.8

Combinations of medications rather than individual medicines are possibly associated with increased risk of birth defects.

Oberlander et al performed a study to determine a population-based incidence of congenital anomalies following prenatal exposure to serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants used alone and in combination with benzodiazepines. In this study, population health data, maternal health, and prenatal prescription records were linked to neonatal records, representing all live births in British Columbia during a 39-month period (1998-2001). Even after controlling for maternal illness profiles, infants exposed to prenatal serotonin reuptake inhibitors in combination with benzodiazepines had an increased incidence of congenital heart disease versus controls who had not been exposed. Serotonin reuptake inhibitor monotherapy was not associated with an increased risk for major congenital anomalies, but was associated with an increased incidence of atrial septal defects, and researchers did not associate risk with first trimester medication dose/day.9

Example Mechanisms of Teratogenesis

The teratogenic effects of medications vary temporally. The fetus' susceptibility to injury depends on its period of development. Different organs have different critical periods, though the span from gestational day 15 to day 60 is critical for many organs. The heart is most sensitive during the third and fourth weeks of gestation, whereas the external genitalia are most sensitive during the eighth and ninth weeks. The brain and skeleton are sensitive from the beginning of the third week to the end of pregnancy and into the neonatal period.

Genetic defects and medications can cause similar abnormalities, such as those resulting from warfarin and Happle syndrome. Several studies are related to axial defects in mice.10,11 In mice, axial malformations can result from mutations in certain HOX genes or from exposure to retinoids. Happle syndrome, or human X-linked dominant chondrodysplasia punctata (CDPX2; see Skeletal Dysplasia), is associated with mutations in the human emopamil-binding protein, a delta-delta-sterol isomerase involved in cholesterol biosynthesis. Happle syndrome is a genetic disease of bone and cartilage characterized by defective bone mineralization, telebrachydactyly, and facial dysmorphism with nasal hypoplasia. Maternal ingestion of warfarin can result in a fetal phenotype similar to that of this syndrome.12

Teratogens, such as cyclophosphamide, result in fetal demise due to excessive apoptosis. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha, transforming growth factor-beta, and other cytokines may mediate excessive apoptosis. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor has been reported to prevent teratogenesis in laboratory animals. That is, studies showing that granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor may prevent teratogenesis in animals.13

Both immunomodulation and hormonal support (eg, with progesterone or human chorionic gonadotropin supplements) have been used to improve the rate of live births in women who have had recurrent abortions. Each can modulate the balance between the manifold cytokines. Neither hormonal support nor immunopotentiation has been proven beneficial. The results and role of cytokines themselves must be assessed in trials of karyotypically normal embryos.

Drug Exposures in the Male Partner

Research is increasingly addressing the role of paternal exposure to medications before conception or during his partner’s pregnancy. Certain exposures may alter the size, shape, performance, and production of sperm. This observation suggests that drug exposure in the male may put the fetus at risk. Animal studies have shown that paternal teratogenic exposure may lead to pregnancy loss or failure of the embryo to develop. However, unlike teratogenic agents affecting pregnant woman, teratogenic agents affecting the father do not seem to directly interfere with normal fetal development. Animal studies showing that paternal teratogenic exposure may lead to pregnancy loss or embryonic failure.14,15

At present, no evidence shows that paternal exposure directly increases the risk of birth defects. However, agents such as recreational drugs do affect sperm quality and, to a limited degree, indirectly expose the developing fetus to the substance. Rather than affecting the developing fetus, teratogens like drug and alcohol seem to lower the likelihood of a woman's becoming pregnant.14,15

Paternal alcohol use may increase the risk of heart defects in newborns. In one study, paternal smoking was associated with heart defects. Chemotherapy or radiation therapy to treat cancer in a father may increase the risk chromosomal abnormalities of the fetus. Studies have demonstrated less-than-normal numbers of chromosomes and damage to the structure of chromosomes in the sperm of men with cancer. No data suggests an increased rate of birth defects in fetuses conceived with sperm from male chemotherapy patients.16,17

Paternal exposure to prescription medications, such as cholesterol- and blood pressure–lowering drugs, has not been linked to a risk of birth defects. Additional research must clearly be conducted to assess the safety of drugs recently released onto the market. Regardless of the lack of evidence supporting a direct influence of paternal exposure on fetal risk, caution is warranted, and the father's physician should provide counseling and active involve the patient.

FDA Rating System for the Teratogenic Effects of Drugs

The FDA, the government agency that oversees the safety of drugs, provides the most widely used system to grade the teratogenic effects of medications. The FDA assigns a safety category for medications by using a 5-letter system: A, B, C, D, and X. This safety category must be displayed on the labels of all drugs.

Table 1. FDA Pregnancy Categories

Open table in new window

Table
CategorySummary and Labeling
ASummary: Fetal risk not revealed in controlled studies in humans

Adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women have failed to demonstrate a risk to the fetus in the first trimester of pregnancy (and there is no evidence of a risk in later trimesters).

Labeling: "Studies in pregnant women have not shown that [the drug] increases the risk of fetal abnormalities if administered during the first [second, third, or all] trimester(s) of pregnancy. If this drug is used during pregnancy, the possibility of fetal harm appears remote. Because studies cannot rule out the possibility of harm, however, [the drug] should be used during pregnancy only if clearly needed."

Must describe the human studies.

If animal reproduction studies are available and fail to demonstrate a risk to the fetus, "Reproduction studies have been performed in [animals] at doses up to [X] times the human dose and have revealed no evidence of impaired fertility or harm to the fetus due to [the drug]."

Must describe available data on the effect of the drug on the later growth, development, and functional maturation of the child.
BSummary: Fetal risk not confirmed in studies in humans but has been shown in some studies in animals

Animal reproduction studies have failed to demonstrate a risk to the fetus and there are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women.

Labeling: "Reproduction studies have been performed in [animals] at doses up to [X] times the human dose and have revealed no evidence of impaired fertility or harm to the fetus due to [the drug]. There are, however, no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. Because animal reproduction studies are not always predictive of human response, this drug should be used during pregnancy only if clearly needed."

If animal reproduction studies have shown an adverse effect (other than decrease in fertility), but adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women have failed to demonstrate a risk to the fetus during the first trimester of pregnancy (and there is no evidence of a risk in later trimesters), "Reproduction studies in [animals] have shown [findings] at [X] times the human dose. Studies in pregnant women, however, have not shown that [the drug] increases the risk of abnormalities when administered during the first [second, third, or all] trimester(s) of pregnancy. Despite the animal findings, it would appear that the possibility of fetal harm is remote, if the drug is used during pregnancy. Nevertheless, because the studies in humans cannot rule out the possibility of harm, [the drug] should be used during pregnancy only if clearly needed."

Must also describe the human studies and available data on the effect of the drug on the later growth, development, and functional maturation of the child.
CSummary: Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Animal reproduction studies have shown an adverse effect on the fetus, there are no adequate and well-controlled studies in humans, and the benefits from the use of the drug in pregnant women may be acceptable despite its potential risks.

Labeling: "[The drug] has been shown to be teratogenic (or to have an embryocidal effect or other adverse effect) in [species] when given in doses [X] times the human dose. There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. [The drug] should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus."

Must describe the animal studies.

If there are no animal reproduction studies and no adequate and well-controlled studies in humans, "Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with [the drug]. It is also not known whether [the drug] can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity. [The drug] should be given to a pregnant woman only if clearly needed."

Must describe any available data on the effect of the drug on the later growth, development, and functional maturation of the child.
DSummary: Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Positive evidence of human fetal risk based on adverse reaction data from investigational or marketing experience or studies in humans, but the potential benefits from the use of the drug in pregnant women may be acceptable despite its potential risks (for example, if the drug is needed in a life-threatening situation or serious disease for which safer drugs cannot be used or are ineffective).

Labeling: "See 'Warnings and Precautions' section."

Under the Warnings and Precautions section, "[The drug] can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. [Human and any pertinent animal data.] If this drug is used during pregnancy, or if the patient becomes pregnant while taking this drug, the patient should be apprised of the potential hazard to a fetus."
XSummary: Contraindicated; benefit does not outweigh risk

Studies in animals or humans have demonstrated fetal abnormalities or there is positive evidence of fetal risk based on adverse reaction reports from investigational or marketing experience, or both, and the risk of the use of the drug in a pregnant woman clearly outweighs any possible benefit (for example, safer drugs or other forms of therapy are available).

Labeling: "See 'Contraindications' section."

Under the Contraindications section, "[The drug] may [or can] cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. [Human and any pertinent animal data.] [The drug] is contraindicated in women who are or may become pregnant. If this drug is used during pregnancy, or if the patient becomes pregnant while taking this drug, the patient should be apprised of the potential hazard to a fetus."
CategorySummary and Labeling
ASummary: Fetal risk not revealed in controlled studies in humans

Adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women have failed to demonstrate a risk to the fetus in the first trimester of pregnancy (and there is no evidence of a risk in later trimesters).

Labeling: "Studies in pregnant women have not shown that [the drug] increases the risk of fetal abnormalities if administered during the first [second, third, or all] trimester(s) of pregnancy. If this drug is used during pregnancy, the possibility of fetal harm appears remote. Because studies cannot rule out the possibility of harm, however, [the drug] should be used during pregnancy only if clearly needed."

Must describe the human studies.

If animal reproduction studies are available and fail to demonstrate a risk to the fetus, "Reproduction studies have been performed in [animals] at doses up to [X] times the human dose and have revealed no evidence of impaired fertility or harm to the fetus due to [the drug]."

Must describe available data on the effect of the drug on the later growth, development, and functional maturation of the child.
BSummary: Fetal risk not confirmed in studies in humans but has been shown in some studies in animals

Animal reproduction studies have failed to demonstrate a risk to the fetus and there are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women.

Labeling: "Reproduction studies have been performed in [animals] at doses up to [X] times the human dose and have revealed no evidence of impaired fertility or harm to the fetus due to [the drug]. There are, however, no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. Because animal reproduction studies are not always predictive of human response, this drug should be used during pregnancy only if clearly needed."

If animal reproduction studies have shown an adverse effect (other than decrease in fertility), but adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women have failed to demonstrate a risk to the fetus during the first trimester of pregnancy (and there is no evidence of a risk in later trimesters), "Reproduction studies in [animals] have shown [findings] at [X] times the human dose. Studies in pregnant women, however, have not shown that [the drug] increases the risk of abnormalities when administered during the first [second, third, or all] trimester(s) of pregnancy. Despite the animal findings, it would appear that the possibility of fetal harm is remote, if the drug is used during pregnancy. Nevertheless, because the studies in humans cannot rule out the possibility of harm, [the drug] should be used during pregnancy only if clearly needed."

Must also describe the human studies and available data on the effect of the drug on the later growth, development, and functional maturation of the child.
CSummary: Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Animal reproduction studies have shown an adverse effect on the fetus, there are no adequate and well-controlled studies in humans, and the benefits from the use of the drug in pregnant women may be acceptable despite its potential risks.

Labeling: "[The drug] has been shown to be teratogenic (or to have an embryocidal effect or other adverse effect) in [species] when given in doses [X] times the human dose. There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. [The drug] should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus."

Must describe the animal studies.

If there are no animal reproduction studies and no adequate and well-controlled studies in humans, "Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with [the drug]. It is also not known whether [the drug] can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity. [The drug] should be given to a pregnant woman only if clearly needed."

Must describe any available data on the effect of the drug on the later growth, development, and functional maturation of the child.
DSummary: Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Positive evidence of human fetal risk based on adverse reaction data from investigational or marketing experience or studies in humans, but the potential benefits from the use of the drug in pregnant women may be acceptable despite its potential risks (for example, if the drug is needed in a life-threatening situation or serious disease for which safer drugs cannot be used or are ineffective).

Labeling: "See 'Warnings and Precautions' section."

Under the Warnings and Precautions section, "[The drug] can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. [Human and any pertinent animal data.] If this drug is used during pregnancy, or if the patient becomes pregnant while taking this drug, the patient should be apprised of the potential hazard to a fetus."
XSummary: Contraindicated; benefit does not outweigh risk

Studies in animals or humans have demonstrated fetal abnormalities or there is positive evidence of fetal risk based on adverse reaction reports from investigational or marketing experience, or both, and the risk of the use of the drug in a pregnant woman clearly outweighs any possible benefit (for example, safer drugs or other forms of therapy are available).

Labeling: "See 'Contraindications' section."

Under the Contraindications section, "[The drug] may [or can] cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. [Human and any pertinent animal data.] [The drug] is contraindicated in women who are or may become pregnant. If this drug is used during pregnancy, or if the patient becomes pregnant while taking this drug, the patient should be apprised of the potential hazard to a fetus."

Source.—Center for Devices and Radiological Health, FDA, 2007.18

Most FDA-approved teratogenic drugs are in categories D or X. However, some medications are in category C. In the discussions that follow, some drugs are considered both individually and as part of broad categories (eg, antifolate agents, anticonvulsant agents).

Although some medications rarely cause birth defects and others commonly cause them, all are considered together in the sections below. The incidence of defects is stated when available. Note that drugs are used to treat disease and that the disease (eg, infection) and not the drug may cause certain birth defects. However, parsing causation and correlation is often difficult.

The Australian Drug Evaluation Committee (ADEC) splits FDA category B into B1, B2, and B3. These categories may be helpful with respect to counseling individual patients.

Table 2. ADEC Pregnancy Subcategories B1, B2, and B3

Open table in new window

Table
CategoryDefinition
B1"Drugs which have been taken by only a limited number of pregnant women and women of childbearing age, without an increase in the frequency of malformation or other direct or indirect harmful effects on the human fetus having been observed.

Studies in animals have not shown evidence of an increased occurrence of fetal damage."
B2"Drugs which have been taken by only a limited number of pregnant women and women of childbearing age, without an increase in the frequency of malformation or other direct or indirect harmful effects on the human fetus having been observed.

Studies in animals are inadequate or may be lacking, but available data show no evidence of an increased occurrence of fetal damage."
B3"Drugs which have been taken by only a limited number of pregnant women and women of childbearing age, without an increase in the frequency of malformation or other direct or indirect harmful effects on the human fetus having been observed.

Studies in animals have shown evidence of an increased occurrence of fetal damage, the significance of which is considered uncertain in humans."
CategoryDefinition
B1"Drugs which have been taken by only a limited number of pregnant women and women of childbearing age, without an increase in the frequency of malformation or other direct or indirect harmful effects on the human fetus having been observed.

Studies in animals have not shown evidence of an increased occurrence of fetal damage."
B2"Drugs which have been taken by only a limited number of pregnant women and women of childbearing age, without an increase in the frequency of malformation or other direct or indirect harmful effects on the human fetus having been observed.

Studies in animals are inadequate or may be lacking, but available data show no evidence of an increased occurrence of fetal damage."
B3"Drugs which have been taken by only a limited number of pregnant women and women of childbearing age, without an increase in the frequency of malformation or other direct or indirect harmful effects on the human fetus having been observed.

Studies in animals have shown evidence of an increased occurrence of fetal damage, the significance of which is considered uncertain in humans."

Source.—Therapeutic Goods Administration, ADEC, 1999.19

Drugs That Reportedly Cause Birth Defects

Data for specific agents in the sections that follow were assembled to assist the provider in weighing the risks and benefits before beginning or continuing their use pregnancy. Information was compiled by selecting commonly used drugs, with an emphasis on recently approved agents.

Discussion of Specific Agents: Acamprosate Calcium to Aminoglycosides

Acamprosate calcium

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors

Acetohydroxamic acid

Aminocaproic acid

Aminoglycosides

Discussion of Specific Agents: Amlodipine/Atorvastatin to Azacitidine

Amlodipine/atorvastatin

Angiotensin II receptor antagonists (angiotensin II receptor blockers [ARBs])

Antineoplastics (busulfan, chlorambucil, cyclophosphamide, mechlorethamine)

Anticonvulsants, first-generation

Apomorphine

Aspirin

Atenolol

Azacitidine

Discussion of Specific Agents: Benzodiazepines to Corticosteroids

Benzodiazepines

Bevacizumab

Birth control pills (oral contraceptives) and hormone replacement therapy

Bromides

Carbamazepine

Cetuximab

Cidofovir

Cinacalcet

Colchicine

Corticosteroids

Discussion of Specific Agents: Danazol to Folic Acid Antagonists

Danazol

Duloxetine

Ergotamine

Estradiol gel 0.06%

Exenatide

Finasteride

Fluoxetine

Fluconazole

Folic acid antagonists

Discussion of Specific Agents: Ibandronate to Lithium

Ibandronate

Lanthanum carbonate

Lenalidomide

Leukotriene receptor antagonists

Lithium

Discussion of Specific Agents: Methimazole to Nelarabine

Methimazole

Methylene blue

Mifepristone, RU-486

Minoxidil

Misoprostol

Mycophenolate mofetil

Mysoline

Natalizumab

Nelarabine

Discussion of Specific Agents: Pegaptanib to Statins

Pegaptanib

Pemetrexed (for injection)

Penicillamine

Phenobarbital or methylphenobarbital

Phenytoin

Potassium iodide

Progesterones

Ramelteon

Retinoids

Rifaximin

Solifenacin succinate

Sorafenib

Statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors)

Sulfasalazine (used in inflammatory bowel disease)

Discussion of Specific Agents: Telithromycin to Warfarin

Telithromycin

Tetracyclines

Thalidomide

Tinidazole

Tiotropium bromide

Trimethadione

Trospium chloride

Valproic acid

Warfarin

Drugs Approved in 2006 and 2007

Table 3. Drugs Approved in 2006 and 2007 With Their FDA Pregnancy Categories

Open table in new window

Table
DrugPregnancy Category
Arformoterol tartrateB
Decitabine (Dacogen; MGI Pharma, Inc Bloomington, MN)D
DarunavirB
EchinocandinC
KunecatechinsC
PaliperidoneC
Quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6, 11, 16, and 18 recombinant vaccineB
Sitagliptin phosphateB
TelbivudineB
Insulin aspart (recombinant DNA [rDNA] origin) injectionB
DrugPregnancy Category
Arformoterol tartrateB
Decitabine (Dacogen; MGI Pharma, Inc Bloomington, MN)D
DarunavirB
EchinocandinC
KunecatechinsC
PaliperidoneC
Quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6, 11, 16, and 18 recombinant vaccineB
Sitagliptin phosphateB
TelbivudineB
Insulin aspart (recombinant DNA [rDNA] origin) injectionB

Keywords

teratogenic, teratogenicity, human X-linked dominant chondrodysplasia punctata, Happle syndrome, Happle's syndrome, Conradi-Hunermann-Happle syndrome, CDPX2, emopamil-binding protein, EBP, fetal ototoxicity, intrauterine growth retardation, IUGR, intrauterine growth restriction, fetal growth restriction, birth defects, pregnancy complications, Dilantin congenital defects, phenytoin toxicity, fetal phenytoin syndrome, fetal hydantoin syndrome, FHS, meadow syndrome, congenital hydantoin syndrome, Dilantin syndrome, fetal Dilantin syndrome, hydantoin syndrome, fetal trimethadione syndrome, fetal warfarin syndrome, warfarin toxicity

seizure disorders in pregnancy, FDA pregnancy category, pregnancy category D, pregnancy category X, drug use during pregnancy and lactation, drug adverse effects, drug exposure during pregnancy, psychosocial and environmental pregnancy risks.

Source : http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/260725-overview
posted by hermandarmawan93 at 10:27

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home